Bobby Fischer essays

Bobby Fischer essays Topic: Bobby Fischer (1943- Present) Thesis: Bobby Fischer is undisputedly a genius chess master, yet it is his personal life that has left the most significant mark on history. B. Bobbys introduction to chess B. Becoming a contender in the chess world C. A champion rises out of the chaos Bobby Fischer proved throughout his chess matches that he is one of the greatest chess players to have ever lived. Beyond that he is just a lost soul grasping on to any hope of redemption. Bobby Fischer has lived a life abnormal to that off the average American in almost every way since he received his first chessboard. He had to persevere through the scrutiny of the public eye and feelings of never being truly accepted for who he felt he was. Bobby has lived a life of turmoil, tragedy and loss. His accomplishments have been overshadowed by his eccentricity and even possible psychotic ailments. With a life like a Shakespearian tragedy, Bobby has sentenced his own self to a life of pain and misery. Through looking at his development from child prodigy into feared grandmaster and then his fall into shambles the true reality of who Booby Fischer is will be revealed. From childhood to adulthood Bobby Fischer has been plagued by many evils of his own conscious mind. Many different ideas have been expressed to why Bobby acts in the manner he does, such as eccentricity, socially inept, and psychologically unstable. Through all of these struggles Bobby was still able to produce some of the most prolific chess matches ever seen. Ranging from his early match with Donald Byrne dubbed the Game of the Century by Hans Kmoch to his crowning moment of becoming the world champion in his triumph over Spassky. Though this is not what is remembered today, it is the refusal to defend the world championship, anti-Semitic remarks, and his current ranting of paranoia on the radio in the Philippines. Bobby Fischer is undisputedly ...

Beware of Whom

Beware of Whom Beware of Whom Beware of Whom By Maeve Maddox I just read a mystery by Sue Grafton in which her character Kinsey Millhone mentally corrects a maid who responds to her phone call by asking Who may I say is calling? The Millhone character thinks Whom, sweetheart, Whom shall I say is calling This passage illustrates the fact that even an excellent writer can have trouble with when to use who and when to use whom. In this case, the maid was right and the detective was wrong. If you want to know why, read on. Like most pronouns, who has two forms: a subject form, who, and an object form, whom. To understand the use of pronoun pairs such as who/whom, he/him, she/her, I/me, they/them, and we/us when used with a verb, one must recognize whether the word is being used as the subject of the verb or as its object. Every verb has a subject. The subject is the doer of an action: I sing. We shop in town. Who knows the secret? Some verbs have objects. The object receives the action: The ball hit me. Dont forget us. Whom do you like best? Most of the time we have little trouble recognizing subject and verb because the subject usually comes before the verb and the object comes after it. The difficulty with who/whom arises from the fact that in a question, word order is reversed. We say Where are you going? and not You are going where?, Whom do you like best? and not You do like whom best? Things get really sticky when a sentence contains more than one clause (i.e., more than one set of subject and verb). The maids response is made up of two clauses. That is, it has two verbs: shall say and is calling. The subject of shall say is I. The subject of is calling is who. The clauses can be constructed in various ways: Who is calling, shall I say? Shall I say who is calling? Who shall I say is calling? The irony of Graftons criticism of the maids use of who is that elsewhere in the novel, Millhone doesnt always use whom when it would be appropriate. Conclusion The use of whom as the object form of who is on its way out of the language. More and more educated speakers and writers use who as both subject and object. There doesnt seem to be any reason not to. Who do you want? has become acceptable. Indeed, to the American ear, Whom do you want? sounds excessively proper. Personally, I like to observe the difference between who and whom in my writing, but I rarely do in speaking. Whatever you do, dont use whom as a subject! Ive seen it done, further proof that this particular point of grammar has lost its significance. If you arent sure whether to use who or whom, go with who. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:When to Capitalize Animal and Plant NamesAt Your Disposal